Dhaka, Bangladesh
Why China clings to state capitalism

Off the track

Why China clings to state capitalism

Robert Samuelson

American officials traveled to China last week in an effort to end the bitter trade war between the two countries. The main obstacle to a settlement is natural rivalry: The United States is trying to protect its position as the most important superpower and China is serving notice that it covets that status for itself. What further complicates matters is a clash of economic systems. China practices state capitalism; the government owns many large firms and decides which industries will receive subsidies, protected markets and favorable loans. In the U.S., private markets and firms mostly determine which companies grow or shrink. The result is a stalemate. Many Chinese policies and practices (rules that coerce the transfer of new technologies or business plans to Chinese businesses, or that discriminate against foreign companies) make perfect sense in the context of state capitalism. But to Americans and other private investors, they violate the norms of open competition and fairness. This makes negotiations exceedingly difficult. For China to abandon its policies would mean, in effect, scrapping its whole economic model. Politically, this would be hard to swallow. Similarly, for the U.S. to condone China’s state capitalism would legitimize a system that puts U.S., foreign and private investors at a permanent disadvantage. The contradictions are inescapable. If an agreement is possible, it may skirt the central differences between the two countries and concentrate on limited Chinese pledges to buy more U.S. imports. Interestingly, the conflict is of recent origin. In a new book — “The State Strikes Back: The End of Economic Reform in China?” — economist Nicholas Lardy of the Peterson Institute for International Economics argues that, until a few years ago, China seemed to be moving gradually toward a system of private enterprise. In 1978, when Deng Xiaoping launched China’s present economic reform, state-owned firms dominated the economy. Now, according to Lardy’s estimates, private firms account for roughly 70 percent of the country’s output (gross domestic product). The reversal came after Xi Jinping assumed leadership of the Communist Party in 2012 and, later, the presidency. He changed course, favoring state-owned firms, as Lardy shows by citing loans to businesses.

Share |